|
|
||||||||
Clinical |
Departments of Surgery,1 Community & Prevention Medicine,2 and Nephrology,3 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence to: A. Keshvari, Surgical Ward 3, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran, Iran. keshvari{at}sina.tums.ac.ir
Background: Patients with previous history of abdominal
operations are sometimes excluded from consideration for peritoneal dialysis
because of concerns for increased risk of complications during the
implantation procedure and inadequate dialysis due to reduced peritoneal
surface area. Employing a laparoscopic approach, we compared the outcome of
peritoneal dialysis catheters in 2 groups of patients with and without
intra-abdominal adhesions.
Methods: All data in this report were recorded
prospectively. Revision-free and overall survival of catheters, the incidence
of mechanical and infectious complication, and surgical revision rates were
compared between the 2 groups.
Results: In 217 successful catheter implantations,
there was a history of previous abdominal surgery in 42.9% of procedures; only
26.9% of them had intraperitoneal adhesions; 2.8% of patients without history
of previous abdominal surgery had intraperitoneal adhesions. There were no
significant differences between the 2 groups for 1- and 2-year revision-free
and overall catheter survival, mechanical dysfunction, infectious
complications, or surgical revision rates.
Conclusion: History of previous abdominal surgery
should not be used to judge the eligibility of patients for peritoneal
dialysis. Laparoscopic placement is the best way to ensure optimal catheter
outcomes equivalent to patients without previous abdominal surgery.
KEY WORDS: Peritoneal dialysis catheter; intraperitoneal adhesion; abdominal operation; laparoscopy.
Received 7 May 2008; accepted 6 February 2009.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |